For applicants typically beyond the age of 35 who may find it difficult to qualify for PR under the Express Entry system, or, for applicants who do not wish to wait for the unpredictable draws, CRS scores for Express Entry PR, and who have strong business acumen, the SUV program provides a direct avenue for PR, and Citizenship.
The SUV program allows for entrepreneurs and established businessmen and women to open a business in Canada, get a letter of support and coaching from a designated organization that will affirm to the Government of Canada that their business has a viable plan, and then leverage that established new business for their PR and citizenship application.
The benefits for the SUV program, is that applicants receive their PR right after approval. There are no stream for draws, such as with select Provincial Nominee Programs inside of the Express Entry system. You have the guarantee of PR and Citizenship once successful.
Up to 5 people may apply per business, and their spouses & dependents, children, may be sponsored.
Download our compact today
We're happy to provide a complimentary compact on the SUV program - and our value add. If retained, we have a comprehensive 30 page report on all details, procedures and cases so you can stay up to date with the process.
We check sanctions lists, assess general possibilities or fitness for the program, and any manifest reason you may not be successful in the application.
Based on your experience, assets, contacts, conduct your market research on what may work in the Canadian market. Research who else is offering this product and/or service and how you can be different.
Based on how you approach our partners at Meticulous & M-Capital, their standard timing is 1 week, however may take up to 3 weeks.
Based on how you approach our associates at a designated organization, you may secure the LOS within 3 business days, or 6 weeks. This will involve a more substantive due diligence process.
You may then apply for a work permit should you wish to come to Canada. You do not need to be in Canada for this time period, however it may assist in ensuring you show seriousness for business growth, and reduce your timelines for citizenship as time spent working in Canada counts towards your citizenship. Please note this is for the submission not processing; timeline of which is contingent on the country of application.
Depending on whether you have your CLB language test results (they are valid for 2 years), have evidence of your qualifications, evidence of funding, and all documentation for your eligibility.
The application will need to be submitted via the Permanent Residence Portal, and government fees paid. Once submitted, you will receive an AoR (Authorization of Receipt). The application may then be connected with a MyCIC account wherein you can get IRCC correspondence and updates.
As of April 2024, the Government publicly processing timeline sits at 36 months. However, this may significantly be reduced as the Government has announced a substantive commitment to investing in hiring more staff for this program and increase spots for applicants.
One of the main reasons applicants are refused is that in their conduct they show little or insufficient interest in moving their business along in Canada, and the officer finds your primary motive is immigration not economic engagement. Within 5 months of receiving your PR file e-number from the IRCC (which may arrive around 1 and a half years after your PR application was submitted under the SUV program) an officer will contact each of the start-up groups co-founders to request updated information on your engagement, called a business progress request (sent to the primary applicant/CEO).
Upon meeting the eligibility criteria, show sufficient financing and pass your medical exam and police certificate, you will send your passport in to the visa office and have your Permanent Residence Visa issued. This is you COPR – confirmation of permanent residence.
As a permanent resident of Canada, you are eligible for most of the privileges that citizens are such as healthcare, social insurance numbers and work. However, you cannot vote or get a passport until you become a citizen. For every day you spend in Canada before becoming a PR, may count as half a day, and for every day after PR, will count for one day. You need 1,095 days out of 5 years immediately before your application.
Our unique offerings exclusively with our firm:
i) Fully licensed lawyers.
ii) Former Government of Canada Immigration Officers (Adjudicative Claims Officer).
iii) Former United Nations and World Trade Organization representatives for Canada.
iv) Meticulous legal planning and risk management, for your file for all refusal points and legal challenges.
v) Top class business plan and funding partnerships with licensed investment bankers in Toronto and New York.
vi) Top class Designated Organization partnerships for your letter of support, commitment certificate and business mentorship, networking.
vii) Unparalleled business growth support with local boards of trade.
viii) Profile provision on our podcasts, website, social media.
Seaker Law is a licensed law firm in Toronto, Canada, with a Licensed Immigration Lawyer as its founding partner. Our founding partner was also an Adjudicative Claims Officer, or a decision maker, with the IRB (Immigration Refugee Board) prior to starting his own practice.
Seaker Law has offices in Toronto, Dubai, and agents for global trade around the world. We are a white glove firm, that prides ourselves on building bridges and new business opportunities.
Our firm’s team has experience working in the Federal Government of Canada’s Immigration Department, the United Nations headquarters in New York, the World Trade Organization in Geneva, and operate global trading houses, servicing entrepreneurs around the world.
Our firm sits as Vice Chair on the Mississauga Board of Trade’s International Trade Committee and has been recognized as instrumental with his entrepreneurial clients’ growth.
One distribution client for an example has been served by our firm for 5 years, and has in that time gone from a company earning around 1 million dollars a year, to 30 million last year. We go beyond the initial legal services, and look to add value to our clients in their operational growth and high value networking.
As licensed lawyers, we provide comprehensive legal bolstering at every stage of your application, and after you become a PR (permanent resident), and citizen in Canada. We have requisitioned training documents and policy guidelines that instruct officers on how to make decisions on their SUV files and have reviewed caselaw related to the SUV program.
We have meticulously drafted procedural fairness letters (letters which require an opportunity for an applicant’s lawyer to explain or manage a concern in an application prior to its refusal) and have closely vetted any designated organization and business plan developer we work with.
Our motto is, we broker opportunity, and provide a white glove quality service. We have and will refuse files in a candid manner when we can see areas of high friction or legal instability. We work with sharp diligence and experienced minds to foresee legal issues on otherwise strong applications and get ahead of the curb with the officer to address them.
One of the most common reasons any application is refused is that they are conducted by unregulated, unrefined, and ungoverned service providers.
Some of the common pitfalls of poor representation:
1- They are not legally licensed in the region they are advising on (we are fully licensed immigration lawyers within the Law Society of Ontario, and accredited by the Federation of Law Societies of Canada).
2- They are inexperienced in the region they are advising on (we are experienced immigration lawyers, who prior to private practice, have worked inside the Federal Government’s immigration departments as decision makers).
3- They have no concept of fiduciary duty and candour, and their primary goal is to make a sale. We only take clients on that we believe with our legal analysis, have reasonable chances of success. We have and will continue to refuse files with low chances of success
and will not sell false dreams at the cost of financial and time harm to our clients.
4- They have low levels of detailed legal knowledge. They prepare applications without sufficient knowledge of the pitfalls. As former Government of Canada decision makers, and as immigration lawyers, we carefully review Operational Guidelines, Ministerial Instructions, the statute, regulations, and case law which all contain essential small details often overlooked by unprofessional advisors. This means we ensure anything we present will satisfy precisely what they look for and protect the record. In the unlikely occurrence of a refusal, we pre-empt our judicial review challenges with a procedural fairness letter. Only licensed lawyers are allowed to advocate in the Federal Court of Canada, where challenges to refused applications may be heard.
For applicants typically beyond the age of 35 who may find it difficult to qualify for PR under the Express Entry system, or, for applicants who do not wish to wait for the unpredictable draws, CRS scores for Express Entry PR, and who have strong business acumen, the SUV program
provides a direct avenue for PR, and Citizenship.
It is meant for those individuals with a high net worth or capitalization, proven business capacity and capability. The official government posted approval rating is around 70%.
78% – for start-ups that are supported by business incubators;
80% – for start-ups that are supported by angel investor networks;
43% – for start-ups that are supported by venture capital funds.
We typically only work with clients with their own capitalization, which has an over 80% approval rating publicly, and Seaker Law currently maintains a 100% approval rating.
The SUV program allows for entrepreneurs and established businessmen and women to open a business in Canada, get a letter of support and coaching from a designated organization that will
affirm to the Government of Canada that their business has a viable plan, and then leverage that established new business for their PR and citizenship application.
The benefits for the SUV program, is that applicants receive their PR right after approval. There are no stream for draws, such as with select Provincial Nominee Programs inside of the Express Entry system. You have the guarantee of PR and Citizenship once successful.
i) Your start up in Canada is “innovative, highly scalable and a high revenue generating business.”
ii) A high quality, detailed business plan or pitch deck;
iii) Letter of Support from a Designated Organization, and a commitment certificate sent to the IRCC (Immigration Refugees Citizenship Canada) by the Designated Organization;
iv) Each foreign national applicant must have at least 10% of the shares, and foreign nationals and their Designated Organization must have at least 50% of the total shares and voting rights in the start-up venture;
v) Each applicant must have a minimum CLB level 5 English or French language skill;
vi) Each applicant must have sufficient funds to settle in Canada, ranging from $12,960 – 34,299 (this is the bare minimum and often capitalization required for IRCC approval is higher);
vii) Ownership of an innovative or successful business that is generating scalable and sustainable revenue, or has strong market validation;
viii) Access to capital (proof of capital) to fund the start-up venture, typically at $200,000 per applicant;
ix) Demonstrate a highly specialized knowledge or unique experience in your field, or show strong management experience.
· Under Subsection 12(2), you may acquire PR under the economic class of immigration based on your ability to become economically established in Canada.
· Under Subsection 14.1(1), the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration may give instructions (Ministerial Instructions) on classes of PR under select programs like the SUV program and provide rules governing such classes.
· As seen below, a summary of Ministerial Instructions has been provided.
· Under Part 6, Division 2, the IRPR includes sections 98.01 to 98.13 which speak about economic class of immigration including the SUV program.
· Under section 98.01, a person may become a PR under the SUV program based on their ability to become economically established in Canada, and who meet the requirements under 98.01(2) and 98.06.
Section 98.01(2) requires:
i) Obtained commitment certificate from a designated organization;
ii) Obtained your language proficiency (level 5 minimum CLB);
iii) Completed at least one year of post-secondary education in good standing; and
iv) Having enough transferable and available funds.
· Section 98.06 speaks about what a qualifying business is:
i) One where an applicant provides active and ongoing management from within Canada;
ii) For which an essential part of its operations is conducted inside Canada;
iii) Incorporated in Canada; and
iv) Has an ownership structure that complies with subsection 98.06(3).
· Notwithstanding the above requirements, under Section 98.06(2), if a business fails to meet any of the requirements in 98.06(1)(a) to (c) is nevertheless a qualifying business if the applicant intends to have it meet those requirements after they have been issued a permanent resident visa.
· Under paragraph 89(b) if the applicant entered one or more of the transactions primarily for the purpose of acquiring a status or benefit under the IRPA, they may be refused.
· Subsection 2(1) of the Ministerial Instructions established the SUV class of PR immigration and defines the class as “foreign nationals who have the ability to become economically established in Canada and meet the requirements of this section.”
· To qualify under the Ministerial Instructions, you must have:
i) Obtained a commitment certificate (letter of support that is sent to the IRCC from your designated organization);
ii) Obtained your language proficiency (level 5 minimum CLB);
iii) Completed at least one year of post-secondary education in good standing; and
iv) Having sufficient transferable and available funds.
· Per section 6 of the Ministerial Instructions, the requisite commitment from a designated organization and the applicant would include:
i) Commitment certificate;
ii) Letter of support;
iii) Documents confirming the applicant’s participation in the program (mentorship);
iv) Terms of agreement;
v) Due diligence assessment of the applicant and their proposed business.
· *Under section 2(5) of the Ministerial Instructions, if an applicant is primarily participating for the purpose of acquiring a status or privilege under the IRPA, rather than for engaging in the identified business activity they may be refused.
After Seaker Law has conducted its first vetting for you and your future company and partners, the first step of the SUV program is one that will be constantly revisited and analyzed by the IRCC. The first step, being developing a business plan, will be conducted by our exceptionally qualified business plan development partners, Meticulous Consulting, sister operations of New York investment banking and asset management firm M-Capital. It is essential that a firm guides you in a plan that maintains your active business involvement and interest, scalability, and innovative* in nature.
Business plans as noted in case law reviewed at the end of this compact, are the basis of refusals if they are of poor quality, detail, or clearly made in a generic cookie cutter manner. Our partners at Meticulous Consulting hand create every package with their investment banking expertise.
Further, our high value network and business partners mean your company and/or investments, will have the potential financing, networking, and support of licensed investment bankers in New York and Toronto.
All fees are baked into your retainer with the firm, and future investment is available for projects or investments you may range from $1-50 million through our partners at Meticulous Consulting. This stage takes anywhere between a week to two, depending on how much thought you placed in this matter.
Following the completion of your business plan, you will need to present your business plan and overall model to a “designated organization” and receive an LOS or “letter of support.” This letter of support is a requirement for the SUV program. It is an affirmation from one of a few Government certified organizations, that express to the Government’s decision makers, that this business will be successful.
The LOS will be issued in 6 weeks, after your attendance within our associated designated organizations’ program (Treefrog inc.). If you fail to secure the LOS, you will have your fees returned less $1,000 CAD. After receiving the LOS in 6 weeks, you will then be eligible to apply for the SUV program thereafter.
There is also an available accelerated pacing program for advanced businesses, which can get the LOS within 3-4 days (all online). This would require an advanced company history or proven commercial history.
If you attend the regular 6 week program for the LOS, you will attend business mentorship sessions for 2 hours on Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday.
The total (current government posting) expected timeline is 37 months. This is widely expected to drop as the Government of Canada has recently spent millions hiring more staff to prioritize this class of immigration.
After you receive your PR with the SUV, you may apply for Citizenship and a Passport after staying in Canada for 1,095 days (3 years) out of 5 years. These can be broken up and not necessarily completed consecutively.
If the officer reviewing your application have concerns (as discussed below) there are risks of further delays, or refusals at a potential peer review stage.
After the Letter of Support is received, and the commitment certificate is sent by the designated organization to the IRCC, the applicant(s) may apply for a PR visa. For the candidate to qualify for permanent residence:
1 - Business Development
We receive your resume(s) and begin “ideation.” Ideation is the process of putting together a business plan that would work for the purposes of this class of immigration. The business plan is a complex, commercial presentation that the application is predicated on. This must be approved by a “designated organization” which are registered businesses authorized by the government to provide a seal of approval on the viability of your business.
The designated organization then provides a required “letter of support” (more on the letter of support below in point 4) depending on a clear and persuasive business plan. Upon providing a letter of support, the designated organization shall also send a "commitment certificate" to the Government, assuring them of the viability of your start-up. We work closely with them to tailor it to the immigration law aspect of the application. The letter of support is required for an SUV application.
The commitment certificate provided to the IRCC includes information about the designated organization, the applicant, the team applying together, the type of business and activities planned, the business structure, further background information, and work permits for the essential applicant(s). The commitment certificate is valid for 6 months within which the PR application must be completed, and where required, a work permit applied for.
Different ways to get the required letter of support
a) With a designated organization incubator (they will assess your business plan and due diligence documents, then provide incubation training for your company’s success).
b) With a designated organization angel investor, or venture capitalist (they will assess your past activity, revenues, profit and typically require proof of market success).
2- Language Requirements
You must have a minimum language score of CLB 5. You do not need to complete this until the SUV application is already sent, in other words this may be accomplished after securing your Letter of Support. A CLB 5 is among the lowest benchmark scores you can achieve.
You may take either CELPIP, IELTS, or PTE depending on what, when and where it would be available in your region.
3- A qualified business
The IRPR under section 98.06 defines a qualified business for the purposes of the SUV program as follows:
Qualifying Business under the Statute:
98.06 (1) For the purposes of paragraph 98.01(2)(d), a qualifying business with respect to an applicant is one
Exception — intention
(2) A business that fails to meet one or more of the requirements of paragraphs (1)(a) to (c) is nevertheless a qualifying business if the applicant intends to have it meet those requirements after they have been issued a permanent resident visa.
To qualify for the SUV, your business must qualify with the following share and ownership requirements
i) Each Applicant must hold 10% or more of the total voting rights;
ii) the applicant and designated organization must hold more than 50% of the total voting rights.
The business may be incorporated either federally, or in a province such as Ontario, where no residency requirements exist under the OBCA. The qualifying business must provide active and ongoing management of their business from inside Canada, and ensure that an essential part of the business operations happen inside of Canada. Seaker Law will incorporate the company for you.
Further, prior to receiving the letter of support, due diligence must be met and passed by the designated organization. The due diligence involves:
i) Constating documents (articles of incorporation etc.);
ii) Sourcing of funds documents;
iii) ID documentation;
iv) Further documents as required.
The business must have an element of innovation and must be scalable. The requirements of the economic establishment capacity are found under subsection 98.01(2) IRPR, highlight what general requirements the business must demonstrate.
98.01 (2) A foreign national is a member of the start-up business class if:
4. Letter of Support
As mentioned above, a letter of support from a designated organization is required for this program. In summary, a designated organization authorized by the Government of Canada is to provide the Government a commitment certificate, which states the viability of your business in Canada, and provide essential business training and mentorship. The commitment certificate they send the government is a critical part of the application evaluation process.
Per the Operational Guidelines that IRCC officers use to review applications, business incubators must provide sufficient combined information within a term sheet, or client agreement, and that the commitment certificate includes several items such as the legal and financial structure of the business, the due diligence procedures, incubator program growth, and so on. Seaker Law has meticulous IRCC training manual-based checklists to thoroughly vet the sufficiency of commitment certificates.
5. Financial Capacity
The SUV is not meant for those with low capitalization. There are financial bars that must be demonstrated for family member support. As of March 2024, if you have 1 family member, you must bring at least $13,757, and if you have up to 7, $36,407. These LICO (low-income cut off) numbers are by no means sufficient per se to qualify you, and they are subject to increase and change every year.
Further, financial capital available is essential to satisfy the officer that your business could survive. We suggest having $200,000 in a bank anywhere for business purposes with the primary applicant.
Settlement funds
Per the operational guidelines and ministerial instructions IRCC officers will review your file and analyze settlement funds with the following:
- Have sufficient funds available for settlement in Canada, at the time of the application and when the application is finalized. The funds must be:
- available and transferable;
- unencumbered by debts or other obligations;
- sufficient to support the initial establishment in Canada;
- must exclude any investment made by a designated entity into the business.
- You must have a bare minimum of (as of March 2024) $13,757- 36,407 depending on family size, and we suggest a bare minimum of $200,000 available in capitalization for the company.
Proof of funds per the operational guidelines IRCC officers will review your file with, require official letters from any banks or financial institutions where they are keeping money. The letters must include a number of requirements, which have been compiled in a checklist drafted by Seaker Law per IRCC training manuals, including but not limited to account information, contact information, and bank information requirements.
6. Work in Canada while the application is under review
While your application for PR is being processed under the SUV, you may apply for a temporary work permit authorizing you to enter and work in Canada, and get started on building your business.
The SUV program specific work permit can only be completed after you have applied for PR under the program, and is valid for 1 year.
Unlike other work permits, the SUV work permit will come alongside form IMM5667 wherein the designated organization that has provided its letter of support to you, will need to explain how you are to provide significant economic benefit, are urgently needed, and essential. You will be able to also sponsor your spouse and dependents, and they may also receive their work or study permits provided sufficient financial backing.
Under the SUV work permit, you are both the employer and employee. This means that you will apply for your work permit in 2 steps. First, you will create and submit an offer of employment for yourself. We will assist you in completing forms in the Employer Portal, or if issues arise, we will email the IRCC. Second, there will be online fees payable. After which, there will be the actual work permit application, wherein you will gather the documents you need depending on your country of origin.
A work permit may be updated and extended based on the evaluation of the PR application. As such these should be completed within tandem of each other in consideration of the 6-month validity period of the commitment certificate.
7. Why applications may get delayed or refused, what is required from you
With any immigration or legal program, there is no guarantee of success. There is a ~80% approval rating for the SUV program, and Seaker Law has had 0 rejections thus far. This is because we vet our applicants deeply, do not take SUV files of low success metrics, and pay extra, at times twice the amount of others, for the highest quality of designated organization incubators available.
Our associated incubators have sat on the IRCC peer review board, and our founding partner lawyer was an Adjudicative Claims Officer at the Immigration Refugee Board before starting his private practice. We provide a level of diligence and understanding of Government requirements and serve with good consciousness only.
Reason 1- Lack of business activity
If you show the government, you only want immigration and are not engaging with the business, would be grounds for not qualifying for this program. Consistent engagement in the business and active involvement is key. Before deciding on your application, the IRCC officer may interview you, and observe how dedicated you are to the business in Canada. When the IRCC concludes the only reason the business exists is for immigration purposes and not a bona fide engagement with the Canadian economy, it would hold it as a ground of refusal. Individuals who are overseas while the SUV is processing, must demonstrate that they have actively been developing their business from abroad.
Reason 2- Business plans generic and unconvincing
When generic, cookie cutter, unconvincing, unsubstantiated business plans land on the desk of an officer, they will naturally have concerns the applicant is not serious about the economic intent of the program and is instead simply using it as a springboard for immigration purposes only. We ensure your business plans are made by licensed professional investment bankers Toronto and New York. Our partners’ plans are hand crafted with direct and empirical financials placed in, unlike other providers who may produce AI generated or template made products. As seen in the case law sections, Seaker Law has reviewed files which were rejected because of poor business plans and engagement, including low quality logos and marketing.
ways to bolster evidence of business activity
· Intellectual property protections (patents, copyrights, licenses, registrations).
· Showing letters of intent for potential sales.
· Showing meetings booked with partners, active agreements being signed, or memorandum of understandings.
· Developing prototypes, models, architectural work for your start-up.
· Building websites, email accounts, showing emails going out and coming in.
· Bids for procurement, and offers of engagement, sales, or partnership with companies in Canada.
Other reasons
· Insufficient capital.
· Applicant has little to no control or has insufficient equity in the business.
· Most or all the applicants are only related to each other, and lack relevant experience or knowledge.
· There is no intellectual property brought into the project and it looks very "cookie cutter."
· The designated organization has charged unusually high fees.
· The management team has limited to no start-up or related experience
· The applicants fail to provide evidence confirming their essential role in the company
· There is a mismatch or contradiction between the LOS granted to your company from the Designated organization and the commitment certificate they issued to the IRCC.
· Failing to conduct adequate or sufficient security checks, being designated a security risk to Canada, or being on a sanctions list;
· Misrepresentation: over inflating or lying about your capacity, experience, existing companies, or any pivotal or material part of your application. Misrepresentation under Section 40(1) of the IRPA, misrepresentation may result in not only a refusal of your application, however also a bar for 5 years to Canada.
· Unresolved medical and/or criminal inadmissibility.
1- Phan v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2022 FC 916
Overview
· Officer refused PR under the SUV program because they concluded the applicants’ primary purpose was for acquiring a status or privilege under the IRPA, and not to engage in the business activity provided in the commitment certificate with the business incubator.
· The applicants requested judicial review on the decision being unreasonable; but failed since they did not demonstrate that the officers made a reviewable error that would permit the court to intervene in the decision.
Background
· The Ministerial Instructions (Minister of Immigration’s directions on how immigration programs are to be run) state that economicimmigration under the SUV program, cannot be solely for the purpose of obtaining PR, there must be a genuine economic engagement element.
· This mandate is found in subsection 2(5) of the Ministerial instructions, in that an applicant is not a member of the SUV business class if their participation is primarily for the purpose of acquiring a status or privilege under the IRPA.
· To summarize, if the IRCC officer believes the main reason the applicant is applying for the program is for immigration, and not genuinely engaging in business within Canada, they would refuse your status in the program, as was the case with this applicant.
Decisions under review
i) Decision in Phan (applicant 1)
· Mr. Phan submitted an SUV application based on a social media platform for prospective and current international university students and their parents.
· They obtained a commitment certificate from Empowered Startups Ltd. a designated business incubator.
· The officer reviewing Mr. Phan’s application was concerned through IRPR para 89(b) that his applicant was primarily for immigration, not engaging in a genuine business in Canada. These concerns are listed below.
ii) Decision in Duong (applicant 2)
· Mr. Duong is an applicant who submitted an SUV PR application based on an e-commerce platform to connect sellers of Canadian agricultural equipment to prospective buyers in Vietnam;
· The officer’s procedural fairness letter again brought up concerns under IRPR para 89(b), that Mr. Duong was only applying for immigration purposes and not actual commercial interests.
· Mr. Duong also utilized Empowered Startups
Basis of officer’s concerns for Phan & second applicant Duong
i) Lack of accomplishments and progress completed in the business venture;
ii) The applicant’s lack of technology experience; and
iii) Poor quality business model, faulty business model, lack of market research and poor quality logo;
iv) Lack of necessity of the venture being inside Canada;
v) Lack of sufficient seriousness from the applicant;
vi) Lack of sufficient due diligence and coaching from their designated organization (empowered startups)
vii) Lack of concrete details on how the applicant was personally involved in the business
viii) Lack of coaching by empowered
Decision
· The court found the Officer’s decision to have been made in a reasonable manner.
· They balanced two separate considerations.
· Firstly: whether new evidence could be considered for this application under Rule 312 of the Federal Court Rules.
· Secondly: whether the Officer’s decision was unreasonable, applying the Vavilov rules.
On new evidence
· The applicants ATIP’d (request for internal information and notes from the Government) information regarding their application, I particular 6 pages of emails between officers.
· These emails had previously led files to be settles prior due to a reasonable apprehension of bias or pertaining to procedural fairness.
· In this particular case the motion to introduce this new evidence on the record was refused as there was no nexus in the material and the decision at hand.
On whether the officer’s decision was unreasonable
· A reasonable decision is one that is based on an internally coherent and rational chain of analysis and is justified in relation to the facts and law that constrain the decision maker, per Vavilov the seminal administrative law Supreme Court of Canada case.
· A court will defer to the decision maker unless the applicant can demonstrate sufficient serious shortcomings that do not exhibit sufficient justification, intelligibility, and transparency.
· The applicants argued the officer made an error of law by failing to determine under IRPR 98.06, whether the applicant intended to meet the active and ongoing management requirement after their being issued a PR visa.
· They argued 98.06 provided them an entitlement to wait. They Also provided the IRCC’s operational instructions and guidelines entitled “assessing the application start up business class, showed the program was predicated upon an applicant’s potential.
· This may have been an effective argument, however *it was not raised prior with the officer.
· The fatal situation here, was that the officer’s decision was challenged based on what was in front of them, not on evidence as involved here that was provided after the decision was made
· As such, Seaker Law ensures such material is provided well in advance, to hedge for this contingency.
Obiter
· This case was filed concurrently with another application (Thanh Tu Duong) which because it was argued concurrently and the same lawyer represented then, it was merged.
2. Maghami v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 542
Overview and decision
Maghami is a brief case wherein a rejected work permit was appealed in judicial review. The Iranian based applicant failed to provide their business plan to the officer and only provided the base documents per the statute and regulations (IRPA and IRPR).
The business plan is an essential document that demonstrates the core principle of the SUV program, in that the applicant genuinely is and will engage with the Canadian economy.
The quality of the business plan is essential, and ought to have been included in the work permit application. Seaker Law works with Meticulous Consulting, a high end business plan developer with offices in New York and Toronto, licensed in several corporate banking regulators in both Canada and the United States. We place a significant amount of importance on the quality of the business plan and its submission to the IRCC. Maghami’s application was refused and he was made to reapply.
3. Karimi v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2023 FC 411
Overview
The Iranian applicants (Karimi was merged with Barari and Jahed) all had refused work permit applications, and this was appealed at judicial review. The refusal was overturned as the judge decided the decision to deny them were unreasonable.
Decisions under review
All refusals were based on the officer not being satisfied that the Applicants would leave Canada at the end of their authorized stays, based on their personal assets, financial status and the purpose of their visits.
The officer purported their analysis of banking statements did not show activity, could not verify source of funds, and that the LICO would not be met for 52 weeks.
Decision
The Judge found these refusals to be unreasonable and overturned them.
On leaving at end of authorized stay
Citing Serimbetoz (see case below) in the context of the SUV program, the officer’s finding that the applicants would not leave Canada at the end of their program was found to be contrary to the very purpose of the program.
Per Justice Diner in Serimbetoz:
[29] It was unreasonable for the Officer to rely on (a) family ties, and (b) purpose of the Applicants’ visit, to conclude that they were unlikely to leave Canada at the end of their authorized stay. The Program, as described above, has as its primary objective permanent residence in Canada on the basis of start-up entrepreneurship. As such, the refusals on the basis of family ties – absent reasonable justification for this basis of refusal – when the work permit applications were expressly intended as a precursor to a forthcoming permanent residency application, was not only inconsistent with the purpose of the Program, but it was also illogical. Indeed, this is a classic case of dual intent as permitted under s. 22(2) of the Act. After all, the Program allows applicants to come to Canada on a work permit before submitting their application for permanent residence, as long as they have a Commitment Certificate, along with a Support Letter from their designated entity.
[30] For the same reasons, the Officer’s consideration of the purpose of the Applicants’ visit was unreasonable, as guidance from IRCC indicates that work permits allow applicants to enter Canada and begin working while their application for permanent residence is still pending (Application Guide at s. 6.5). This is the exact purpose that the Applicants sought to pursue in their applications, and for which due diligence had already been conducted by the Designated Entity. If the Officer doubted their purpose in coming to Canada was for the establishment and launch of the business, or that a lack of due diligence had been done by the Applicants, that should have been explained.
Instead, the Decisions also lacked reasonable justification as a basis for refusal. An example of a reasonable justification for finding that the Applicants were unlikely to leave Canada at the end of their authorized stay could have been, for instance, evidence of prior non-compliance with immigration laws (Gulati v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2021 FC 1358 at para 11; Rosenberry v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2012 FC 521 at para 115). However, there is no indication that any of these Applicants have ever breached an immigration law and no justification was provided for any such concern.
[31] In the absence of any other indication of why the Officer was not satisfied the Applicants would leave Canada at the end of the period authorized for their stay, I find the Officer’s Decisions were both lacking in rationale and justification, given the parameters of the Program and the work permits filed under it.
Further, the officer’s concerns about the source of funds and lack of transactional history in that account was improper. Citing Muthui where the same was reviewed, that applicant had been interviewed and explicitly requested for source of funds documentation and explanation.
4. Serimbetoz v. Canada (Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship), 2022 FC 1130
Overview
As noted above in Karimi, in Serimbetoz, Justice Diner overturned an unreasonable decision by the officer in refusing the applicants’ work permit.
The applicants were all citizens of Kazakhstan who were refused a work permit to set up their greenhouses startup.
The applicants had applied for an LMIA exempt visa under C-10 (that they were of international renown). Seaker Law would have submitted this application under exemption code A77.
The officer’s decision was held to be unreasonable as there was a failure to connect a coherent or rational nexus between the grounds of refusal and primary purpose of the program.
Copyright © 2023 Seaker law professional corporation - All Rights Reserved.